Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Brooks Reitz's avatar

Great piece, Jason. I'm a Kentucky boy and I packed up and moved to Louisville the DAY after I graduated college. In high school we took road trips just to visit ear-x-tacy, two hours each way. It was the greatest record store to ever exist, at least to me, a small town boy. It's long since turned into a Panera Bread, but my moments browsing their racks were my richest, most joyful of music discovery, at a time when I was gaining more listening independence and defining what I loved. I think that magnetism of ear-x-tacy bred a real thoughtful music community. I worked at a hotel and restaurant downtown, and I hired Edward (you listed him as Richard) Grimes. He was such an incredible guy - bright, loving, funny, goofy. At that point he would play some music here and there, and mostly he brushed off his output with Rachel's in a very humble way. Like, oh, that old thing? But I didn't learn just how fucking great they were until several years later. I think Edward would be so happy to know this music lives on. And further to your point, Louisville kept generating talent, with more mainstream breakouts from Nappy Roots, My Morning Jacket, and Jack Harlow.

Byron B's avatar

I was just thinking about Rachel's and this album in particular for the past weeks. It's something I've done several times every year since it was released. Maybe younger people who are into music still do this but I think it may be something that those of us who hung around record stores a lot back in the day are more prone to do.

There was definitely a buzz around the record at the time although the math rockers and lower east sider types viewed it with their usual suspicion reserved for anything that sounded remotely melodic. "Post-rock" may have been an inadequate term but it was still better than "new music" or "experimental music" which were the monikers most commonly used in my corner of the Great Lakes. There's even something charmingly, naively optimistic about the term.

I'm a casual classical listener who favors 20th and 21st century music and I remember those heady years when you could walk into an independent record store and readily pick up a La Monte Young or William Basinski CD with warm nostalgia. Like many of us, my first experiences with an album are typically rooted in memories of standing over a bin, holding a record in my hand as we decided to risk the purchase. It's definitely a major reason why I'm still a physical media guy and I thought this shift toward a more handmade vibe in packaging among a fair amount of artists was a nice touch.

I went through a long phase with this record and am drawn to it every fall and winter (interestingly, you reference Tara Jane O'Neil whose "You Sound, Reflect" I've had a similar relationship with over the decades). I backtracked through Rachel's earlier work in short order and while those records have much to recommend about them they've never quite gotten under my skin. Their follow-up disc, "Selenography," is a more expansive, perhaps richer work that shows the group coming into full maturity and has actually become my favorite of their albums and the record I listen to the most. "Systems/Layers" on the other hand has just never clicked with me despite repeated listenings and feels like a disappointing coda to what should have been a much longer career. I sample Rachel Grimes's later solo work from time to time and perhaps someday it will click with me but it hasn't yet.

In the end, "Music for Egon Schiele" is one of those lightning-in-a-bottle records that any group would be fortunate to record and I'm grateful to have discovered it. It didn't shape my listening or open any doors for me but it did leave a lasting impression and that's enough. In retrospect, it's a testament to the album's singular beauty that people still listen to it and write about it (thank you, by the way). The contemporary classical scene is certainly more porous these days and there seem to be more musicians and listeners than ever open to blurring boundaries the way Rachel's did and while there's no shortage of composers and ensembles tinkering with the contemporary chamber music form, nothing else I've heard yet comes close to this piece.

Even if the group's contribution isn't more widely acknowledged I still think they left a legacy. Like you, I'd love to hear Grimes assemble a group, do a tour and play the piece in its entirety but she seems to have moved on.

2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?